seven
The War on Knowledge: How America Can Fight Back
An analysis of the systematic attack on American knowledge infrastructure and the path forward
The Destruction: A Deliberate Dark Age
The Trump administration has launched an unprecedented assault on American knowledge infrastructure that goes far beyond typical political disagreements about funding. This is a systematic campaign to destroy the very capacity for independent research, evidence-based governance, and democratic accountability.
The scale is staggering: over $11 billion in research funding cut, thousands of scientists and civil servants eliminated, decades of public health databases destroyed. NIH funding slashed by 44%, consolidating 27 institutes into just 8. The CDC lost at least 143 datasets and over 8,000 web pages. More than 2,000 research grants totaling $1.5 billion canceled outright.
But this isn't about budget efficiency—it's about epistemological control. The administration is systematically targeting any knowledge that might challenge Trumpist ideology: climate research, diversity studies, disease surveillance, historical records about slavery and discrimination, even basic weather data that helps states prepare for disasters.
The architects are clear about their goals. Russell Vought, the Project 2025 mastermind now running the Office of Management and Budget, wants federal workers "in trauma." Elon Musk's DOGE operatives, many barely out of college, are "camping out" in federal agencies with access to sensitive systems. Christopher Rufo calls for "laying siege to institutions" to advance his anti-diversity crusade.
Their vision is a society dependent on Trump-aligned information sources, where citizens lack the data, expertise, and institutional capacity to challenge authority. Like the warlords who sacked Rome, they're creating a new Dark Age—except this one is deliberate and designed to prevent recovery.
The Resistance: Democracy's Immune System Activates
The good news? Democracy is fighting back with everything it has, and the tools of resistance have arrived just in time.
Legal warfare is already showing results. Federal judges have blocked key DOGE actions, university funding freezes, and data destruction efforts. Harvard is suing over First Amendment violations. Twenty-two state attorneys general are coordinating legal challenges. The administration's rushed, legally dubious tactics are creating vulnerabilities that courts are willing to exploit.
Scientific communities are mobilizing like never before. Over 200 university presidents have issued joint statements opposing political interference. Researchers are engaged in "a mad scramble" to preserve federal data before it disappears. Professional associations are hosting critical datasets. Universities are creating "bridge" funding programs for researchers whose grants were cut.
Technology is proving decisive. Scientists are using AI and automation to rapidly archive threatened data, detect website changes in real-time, and coordinate preservation efforts across institutions. Blockchain systems are creating censorship-resistant archives. International partnerships are enabling continued research despite federal cuts.
States and localities are stepping up. State attorneys general are suing, state health departments are maintaining their own surveillance systems, and state universities are providing alternative funding. The federal system's distributed nature is proving more resilient than the destroyers anticipated.
The knowledge destroyers are using 20th-century tactics against 21st-century information systems that are inherently harder to suppress. The same AI capabilities they're trying to control are being deployed to preserve and protect the knowledge they're trying to destroy.
The Reconstruction: A Generational Project
Recovery will require unprecedented coordination, sustained political will, and massive resources over decades. But it's possible—if we start now.
Short-term survival (0-2 years) depends on aggressive data preservation, legal resistance, and alternative funding. The scientific community is already building distributed networks that can function without federal support. International partnerships are providing lifelines for displaced researchers.
Medium-term adaptation (2-8 years) requires building parallel institutions: state-level research programs, international collaborations, private-sector partnerships, and technology-enabled networks that bypass federal control. Scientists and educators must become politically active, running for office and lobbying for evidence-based governance.
Long-term restoration (8-20+ years) demands massive reinvestment in research infrastructure, rebuilt civil service protections, new accountability mechanisms, and cultural renewal that values expertise and evidence-based thinking. This will require sustained electoral victories and possibly constitutional changes to protect research independence.
The key strategic principles: distribute everything to make knowledge impossible to destroy from a single point; build redundancy across institutions and funding sources; go international to leverage global democratic allies; think generationally about 20-year rebuilding cycles; document relentlessly to create undeniable records of destruction; and stay legal to use courts and procedures as shields.
AI: The Game-Changing Ally
Perhaps most importantly, artificial intelligence has emerged as democracy's secret weapon in this fight. AI can rapidly preserve threatened data, detect information manipulation, accelerate legal research, coordinate resistance efforts, and design more resilient knowledge systems.
These capabilities arrived just in time. Twenty years ago, this kind of systematic knowledge destruction might have been irreversible. Today, we have the tools to fight back—if we're smart enough and fast enough to deploy them.
The race is on between institutional destruction and technological preservation. The outcome will determine whether America enters a new Dark Age or emerges with more resilient, democratic knowledge systems than ever before.
The Choice Before Us
This isn't just about scientific research or university funding. It's about whether democracy can survive without the knowledge infrastructure that makes informed self-governance possible.
The damage being done now will ripple through decades. Some will be irreversible. But human knowledge and democratic institutions have survived authoritarian attacks before. The question isn't whether we can survive, but whether we'll have the political will to rebuild what's being destroyed—and whether we'll do it before the damage becomes so extensive that recovery becomes impossible.
The tools for resistance and restoration exist. The legal frameworks provide opportunities. The scientific community is mobilizing. International allies are ready to help.
What we need now is sustained commitment, strategic coordination, and the recognition that preserving knowledge is preserving democracy itself.
The war on knowledge is real. But so is our capacity to fight back.
The choice is ours—and the time is now.